<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomstark.net/?p=699&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>shameless self-promotion™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:20:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>No need for apologies, Nathan. I appreciate you giving it a full read! It saved me having to write it all over again. :)

I know people will continue to disagree with me, but that&#039;s all right. 

Anyway, thanks for your presence and for your genuine concern. 

Grace and peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need for apologies, Nathan. I appreciate you giving it a full read! It saved me having to write it all over again. <img src='http://thomstark.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I know people will continue to disagree with me, but that&#8217;s all right. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your presence and for your genuine concern. </p>
<p>Grace and peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schulz</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>Well i apoligize, i definately did not read through the whole post and now that i have gone over it fully i understand where your coming from. Thanks for the insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i apoligize, i definately did not read through the whole post and now that i have gone over it fully i understand where your coming from. Thanks for the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t just address cussing in that post, Nathan. Or didn&#039;t you read it? I tell you why I insulted Bowland, and why that&#039;s a perfectly Christian thing to do. 

Ditto Ira.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t just address cussing in that post, Nathan. Or didn&#8217;t you read it? I tell you why I insulted Bowland, and why that&#8217;s a perfectly Christian thing to do. </p>
<p>Ditto Ira.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>If Bowland were hungry, he should be fed. Were he thirsty, he should be offered drink. If he had no shelter, he should be welcomed into our homes.

If he&#039;s spouting dangerous, misogynistic, jingoistic theology, then he should be called on it.

What&#039;s to understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bowland were hungry, he should be fed. Were he thirsty, he should be offered drink. If he had no shelter, he should be welcomed into our homes.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s spouting dangerous, misogynistic, jingoistic theology, then he should be called on it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s to understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schulz</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>i think you misunderstood me. i dont care about cussing, i just care about loving people and if thats not what your doing here then i just dont get it. Doesn&#039;t Bowland deserve the same love as the innocent children in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you misunderstood me. i dont care about cussing, i just care about loving people and if thats not what your doing here then i just dont get it. Doesn&#8217;t Bowland deserve the same love as the innocent children in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2042</guid>
		<description>What &quot;we&quot; should do does not concern me. I have displayed why I did what &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; should do, here: http://thomstark.net/?p=769</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;we&#8221; should do does not concern me. I have displayed why I did what <i>I</i> should do, here: <a href="http://thomstark.net/?p=769" rel="nofollow">http://thomstark.net/?p=769</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schulz</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>Hey Thom i get that, there definately should be anger but bashing Bowland as a person really makes us no better than him. hes still a good guy even though he is definately off in his views. But that doesnt mean we should attack his person. If anything we need to continue to show him love and pray that he will see why he is wrong. That is the only way that he can be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thom i get that, there definately should be anger but bashing Bowland as a person really makes us no better than him. hes still a good guy even though he is definately off in his views. But that doesnt mean we should attack his person. If anything we need to continue to show him love and pray that he will see why he is wrong. That is the only way that he can be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>Good to hear, Michael. Thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear, Michael. Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael S.</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Wow, I am disgusted and ashamed that this sermon was preached at Ozark.  
Your response was very appropriate and much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I am disgusted and ashamed that this sermon was preached at Ozark.<br />
Your response was very appropriate and much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>Craig,

Honored to have you on my blog. I&#039;d love to read what you&#039;ve written on just war. I&#039;ve read your book on Campbell and I read an essay you did on the history of pacifism in the Stone-Campbell tradition, which Chris Smith sent me. 

Fortunately, a week after Terry Bowland preached, professor Damien Spikereit preached on peace, and responded quite directly to some of the things Bowland said. OCC is not without faithful Stone-Campbell representation, but the majority seems to tow the conservative Evangelical party line. 

Thanks for your comments; they are on point. And thanks for the link to your website. I will be sharing that around. Some valuable resources there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,</p>
<p>Honored to have you on my blog. I&#8217;d love to read what you&#8217;ve written on just war. I&#8217;ve read your book on Campbell and I read an essay you did on the history of pacifism in the Stone-Campbell tradition, which Chris Smith sent me. </p>
<p>Fortunately, a week after Terry Bowland preached, professor Damien Spikereit preached on peace, and responded quite directly to some of the things Bowland said. OCC is not without faithful Stone-Campbell representation, but the majority seems to tow the conservative Evangelical party line. </p>
<p>Thanks for your comments; they are on point. And thanks for the link to your website. I will be sharing that around. Some valuable resources there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig M. Watts</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig M. Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing the comments. I don&#039;t know Terry Bowland but if your depiction of his message is remotely fair, he sounds like someone empowered by the arrogance of ignorance. It is sad that such anti-Christian garbage can be proclaimed at a Christian College without someone who knows what he or she is talking about having equal time. So sad that many in the Stone-Campbell tradition have so completely lost their way, conforming to the pride and violence of this world rather than being conformed to Christ as scripture bears witness to him. Folks like Bowland -as you have described him- tend to claim to stand within the just war tradition but in fact they are simply clueless about the real content of that tradition, to say nothing of their failure to grasp biblical pacifism, grounded as it is in the cross. Those who try to blow off nonviolent Christian discipleship as &quot;liberal&quot; are really counterfeit conservatives who have no serious interest in conserving the way of Jesus. If you are interested, I can send you a couple essays I&#039;ve written on just war, one published in Encounter last year and other that will appear in the next issue. Considering your interest in biblical peaceableness and the problem of nationalism, you might find of some interest some of the essays here: http://www.disciplespeaceharbinger.com/ Keep your passion for true discipleship alive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing the comments. I don&#8217;t know Terry Bowland but if your depiction of his message is remotely fair, he sounds like someone empowered by the arrogance of ignorance. It is sad that such anti-Christian garbage can be proclaimed at a Christian College without someone who knows what he or she is talking about having equal time. So sad that many in the Stone-Campbell tradition have so completely lost their way, conforming to the pride and violence of this world rather than being conformed to Christ as scripture bears witness to him. Folks like Bowland -as you have described him- tend to claim to stand within the just war tradition but in fact they are simply clueless about the real content of that tradition, to say nothing of their failure to grasp biblical pacifism, grounded as it is in the cross. Those who try to blow off nonviolent Christian discipleship as &#8220;liberal&#8221; are really counterfeit conservatives who have no serious interest in conserving the way of Jesus. If you are interested, I can send you a couple essays I&#8217;ve written on just war, one published in Encounter last year and other that will appear in the next issue. Considering your interest in biblical peaceableness and the problem of nationalism, you might find of some interest some of the essays here: <a href="http://www.disciplespeaceharbinger.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.disciplespeaceharbinger.com/</a> Keep your passion for true discipleship alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>Nathan Schulz,

You&#039;re mistaken that my response was an emotional reaction. I thought about it for five days before writing anything down, sort of like Jesus slept on it before attacking the temple. 

But you&#039;re right that there is anger, as there should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan Schulz,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re mistaken that my response was an emotional reaction. I thought about it for five days before writing anything down, sort of like Jesus slept on it before attacking the temple. </p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right that there is anger, as there should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Schulz</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>Hey so there were actually 4 students who walked out. just saying. haha But i like the respone it points out pretty much everything that was wrong with that sermon. The only issue i have though is that i feel like if your gonna write a rebuke to someone you should make sure it is all based out of love and not anger. I could be wrong but it seems like this response is coarsing with emotions and the majority of it being anger. Otherwise keep doing what your doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey so there were actually 4 students who walked out. just saying. haha But i like the respone it points out pretty much everything that was wrong with that sermon. The only issue i have though is that i feel like if your gonna write a rebuke to someone you should make sure it is all based out of love and not anger. I could be wrong but it seems like this response is coarsing with emotions and the majority of it being anger. Otherwise keep doing what your doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe #2</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe #2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>&quot;If our enemy had his way, he would see every man in this assembly emasculated, humiliated. If our enemy had his way, he would see every woman here raped, beaten and sold into slavery. If our enemy had his way, he would have every child sodomized, brutalized, violated again, and again, and again.&quot;
 
Thom, I assume the quote was from this Bowland character...sorry, couldn&#039;t stand to listen to the recording for longer than...okay I didn&#039;t even try.  I am drawn to think about the wars in the ancient world, as well as the different groups fighting them (Assyrians, Babylonians, et al.).  It seems (even through surface readings of ancient history) that these (as in, the pleasant images given by the bowland character) were common practices practiced by the victors.  Perhaps not all of them, we can hope, but my point is this, I don&#039;t recall &quot;our enemy&quot; as receiving credit for these kinds of things.  Again, it seemed that Yahweh was proctor of these ancient &#039;mishaps&#039; to poor Israel (me thinks of the babologna captivity: As a side note, I did enjoy your post on salvation, esp. where the captivity period was mentioned...interesting discussion).  Care to comment?  

By the way, quit cussing on your blog, you asshole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If our enemy had his way, he would see every man in this assembly emasculated, humiliated. If our enemy had his way, he would see every woman here raped, beaten and sold into slavery. If our enemy had his way, he would have every child sodomized, brutalized, violated again, and again, and again.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thom, I assume the quote was from this Bowland character&#8230;sorry, couldn&#8217;t stand to listen to the recording for longer than&#8230;okay I didn&#8217;t even try.  I am drawn to think about the wars in the ancient world, as well as the different groups fighting them (Assyrians, Babylonians, et al.).  It seems (even through surface readings of ancient history) that these (as in, the pleasant images given by the bowland character) were common practices practiced by the victors.  Perhaps not all of them, we can hope, but my point is this, I don&#8217;t recall &#8220;our enemy&#8221; as receiving credit for these kinds of things.  Again, it seemed that Yahweh was proctor of these ancient &#8216;mishaps&#8217; to poor Israel (me thinks of the babologna captivity: As a side note, I did enjoy your post on salvation, esp. where the captivity period was mentioned&#8230;interesting discussion).  Care to comment?  </p>
<p>By the way, quit cussing on your blog, you asshole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: likemindead</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>likemindead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1834&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;lancelot:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;blockquote&gt;People like Terry Bowland do their moral reasoning from the vantage point of empire. For that very reason, their moral reasoning can never be genuinely “Christian.” It has a completely different set of assumptions. Bowland reasons like Caesar. Jesus reasons more like somebody who grew up in Iraq or Afghanistan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That might be the most beneficial thing said about this whole situation.  Thanks for that, Thom.
- L
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I second this.

&lt;b&gt;[mccracken]&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-1834" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>lancelot:</em></strong><br />
</a></p>
<blockquote><p>People like Terry Bowland do their moral reasoning from the vantage point of empire. For that very reason, their moral reasoning can never be genuinely “Christian.” It has a completely different set of assumptions. Bowland reasons like Caesar. Jesus reasons more like somebody who grew up in Iraq or Afghanistan.</p></blockquote>
<p>That might be the most beneficial thing said about this whole situation.  Thanks for that, Thom.<br />
- L
</p></blockquote>
<p>I second this.</p>
<p><b>[mccracken]</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>buuurn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buuurn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>I fell for the Hitler quote. I had it pegged as Mark Driscoll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fell for the Hitler quote. I had it pegged as Mark Driscoll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Shane. That&#039;s good to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Shane. That&#8217;s good to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>An important voice to this whole conversation is Damien Spikereit&#039;s sermon in today&#039;s chapel...it truly was a fantastic and well put together response to the previous sermon that has caused such a firestorm (complete with an apologia for Mother Theresa and even a picture of Jesus not holding a gun but giving a peace sign).  It was done in the Spirit of Romans 12:14-21, which was read by his wife right before the sermon.  While we all (at OCC and all over America) have a long way to go on this issue, Damien&#039;s sermon truly was a welcome addition to the conversation that left me (and other pacifists) feeling like a voice of peace was heralding a response in the Spirit that characterizes our non-violent stance.  Get it as soon as it is up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important voice to this whole conversation is Damien Spikereit&#8217;s sermon in today&#8217;s chapel&#8230;it truly was a fantastic and well put together response to the previous sermon that has caused such a firestorm (complete with an apologia for Mother Theresa and even a picture of Jesus not holding a gun but giving a peace sign).  It was done in the Spirit of Romans 12:14-21, which was read by his wife right before the sermon.  While we all (at OCC and all over America) have a long way to go on this issue, Damien&#8217;s sermon truly was a welcome addition to the conversation that left me (and other pacifists) feeling like a voice of peace was heralding a response in the Spirit that characterizes our non-violent stance.  Get it as soon as it is up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomstark.net/?p=699#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Boom. You&#039;re right. That was the best part of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boom. You&#8217;re right. That was the best part of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
