thomstark.net
some call it dreams and visions
some call it dreams and visions
Six days later, Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain apart, by themselves. And he was transfigured before them, and his clothes became dazzling white, such as no one on earth could bleach them. And there appeared to them Elijah with Moses, who were talking with Jesus. Then Peter said to Jesus, ‘Rabbi, it is good for us to be here; let us make three dwellings, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.’ He did not know what to say, for they were terrified. Then a cloud overshadowed them, and from the cloud there came a voice, ‘This is my Son, the Beloved; listen to him!’ Suddenly when they looked around, they saw no one with them anymore, but only Jesus. (Mark 9:2-8)
This account of the so-called transfiguration of Jesus is often taken as evidence for the divinity of Jesus. That Jesus appeared “dazzling white” is thought to be a reflection of his true nature—a temporary revelation of his divine glory. But the text would not have been understood this way by Mark’s audience. What are the elements involved here? Jesus ascends a mountain, accompanied by his close companions. At the top of the mountain, Jesus becomes transfigured, glowing like radiant light. Jesus is then joined by two prophets from of old, Moses and Elijah, both of whom encountered God in mountaintop experiences, both of whom were said by tradition to have ascended into heaven. Seeing Jesus transfigured, his companions become terrified. On the mountain Jesus is enveloped in a cloud, and the voice of God speaks, identifying Jesus as his “Son,” who is “beloved,” and charges Jesus’ companions to “listen to him.”
Comparisons between this account and the experience of Moses on the mountain in Exodus 34 are not hard to find. Moses ascends the mountain with his companion Joshua. Moses enters the cloud of God’s glory and speaks with God, hearing his voice. When Moses comes out of the cloud and is seen by Aaron and the Israelites, they become terrified. The face of Moses is aglow with the radiance of God’s glory. Israel is charged to listen to Moses, who mediates the word which he received on the mountain to the people of God.
Elijah too encountered God, and heard God’s voice, on the mountaintop. In the ancient cosmology, it was believed that the gods lived in the heavens (i.e., skies) and that the ascent of a mountain brought one closer to the dwelling place of the gods, making close encounters possible.
Jesus here is portrayed as God’s prophet, a prophet no less significant than Moses and Elijah. In his terror, Peter offers to build monuments or tents to each of the three prophets: Jesus, Elijah and Moses. That Jesus is accompanied by these prophets indicates how Jesus is portrayed here, as a prophet in the company of prophets.
He is called God’s son, which is a title bestowed upon many a human being throughout history, from Adam, to Moses, to David, to Israel as a collective, and so on. It is primarily a royal appellative. As with Moses and David, Jesus is to be seen as king and prophet. He is also called “beloved,” which may be an allusion to the binding of Isaac (Gen 22:2), a Markan foreshadowing of Jesus’ impending sacrificial death. This account is in fact preceded and followed by predictions of Jesus’ suffering.
There is no indication in the text that Jesus is to be seen as anything more than a human being. The radiance that exudes from his clothes does not reflect a hidden divine nature, but the glory of God which again meets the preeminent prophet upon the mountain, at yet another—indeed this ultimate—crucial moment in salvation history.
February 4, 2010 - 6:45 PM
Next.
February 4, 2010 - 6:49 PM
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sometime tonight.
February 4, 2010 - 7:36 PM
Yes, but white is YHWH’s favorite color. Didn’t think of that one, did you?
February 4, 2010 - 7:40 PM
Yahweh’s favorite color is blood.
February 4, 2010 - 7:47 PM
Correction…dazzling white.
Not to get too far ahead, but you’ve shown how the text could be understood by Mark’s readers, showing that Jesus:
- is a prophet no less significant than Moses and Elijah
- is in some sense royal, kingly
- is the center of some crucial moment in salvation history
What significance do you see in that when Peter offers to honor all three prophets, God commands them to listen to Jesus and then whisks away the others? Is that why you use the word ‘ultimate’?
If I’m understanding you right, you’re saying that this passage would mean that Jesus is the expected Messiah but that, as with other OT passages regarding the Son of Man or God’s son, this does not necessarily denote divinity….right? Or at the very least, not equality with YHWH.
February 4, 2010 - 7:51 PM
Not divinity at all, and certainly not on the level of Yahweh. All it says is that Jesus is a prophet. It doesn’t even say that he’s a human prophet because that’s not even a question. Of course he’s human. Nothing said about Jesus here indicates he has any more “divinity” than Moses or Elijah.
Moses and Elijah are whisked away because it is Jesus’ moment. They were there, as his predecessors, to encourage and to validate him.
“Ultimate,” in the sense that he is supposedly ushering in the final stage of salvation history.
February 4, 2010 - 9:33 PM
nice.
February 6, 2010 - 7:51 PM
Thanks for considering my vote anyway, but fair enough. And so the topical approach begins. Nice first write-up. I think this is the shortest piece you’ve ever written.
Not to attack ad hominem here (this isn’t even an attack, so please don’t take it as one), but in wondering your interest in proving Jesus is not YHWH God here and reading on the prior post about your second thesis being about Muslim and Christian similarities, I wonder if your motivation doesn’t stem from considering and attempting to eliminate the Muslim stumbling block of there being multiple gods and committing idolatry with our belief about Jesus being God and the Trinity in general in Christianity.
Thoughts?
February 6, 2010 - 8:20 PM
“I think this is the shortest piece you’ve ever written.”
Don’t worry. They get ridiculously long after a few posts.
“I wonder if your motivation doesn’t stem from considering and attempting to eliminate the Muslim stumbling block of there being multiple gods and committing idolatry with our belief about Jesus being God and the Trinity in general in Christianity.”
That would be a welcome byproduct of my work, as far as I’m concerned. But is that what’s motivating me? No. Maybe that would be a good motivation. But in reality, I was just doing the research for its own sake, not really thinking about the implications.
February 8, 2010 - 8:51 AM
I’m days behind in reading these, but I’ll comment anyhow.
I have to tell you I don’t recall very many people (preachers or profs) making a case for the transfiguration as “proof” for divinity. I’ve certainly never read it that way. The common denominators between the 3 prophets (and others) have always been too strong to assign divinity based on this singular experience.
February 8, 2010 - 9:43 AM
I know. That’s why it’s first and short. I’ve heard people use it emphatically, so I’m just covering my bases.
February 18, 2010 - 8:30 PM
Okay Thom, I got REALLY bored so I am reading the series now. I wish they were all as short as this one.
February 18, 2010 - 8:33 PM
Yay!
August 15, 2010 - 7:34 PM
Ok… shiny does not necessarily mean YHWH.
…and on to the next one. I’m enjoying these, but might have to invest some serious time in my next reading sesh’.
August 15, 2010 - 7:37 PM
Yeah, the first three posts are kind of basic. But some people need to hear it.