thomstark.net
a theology of obliteration
a theology of obliteration
Many assume that the image of Jesus being seated on God’s throne, or at the right hand of God, is evidence that a claim is being made about Jesus’ divinity. After all, the logic goes, who can sit on God’s throne but God himself? But this is a misunderstanding of ancient royalty language. For instance, in the book of Chronicles it is said that “Solomon sat on the throne of Yahweh, succeeding his father David as king” (1 Chron 29:23). This did not mean that Solomon shared in God’s divine identity in any ontological sense; but it expresses the belief that the authority of the king is granted by God himself.
In the Similitudes of Enoch, we see the same idea, this time however applied to the eschatological Messiah, the Son of Man figure.
And there was great joy amongst them,
And they blessed and glorified and extolled
Because the name of that Son of Man had been revealed unto them.
And he sat on the throne of his glory. (1 Enoch 69:26-27)
From this throne, the eschatological Son of Man is said to judge the nations, a function that is properly God’s, but one which God extends to his preeminent agent:
And the sum of judgment was given unto the Son of Man,
And he caused the sinners to pass away and be destroyed from off the face of the earth,
And those who have led the world astray.
With chains shall they be bound,
And in their assemblage-place of destruction shall they be imprisoned,
And all their works vanish from the face of the earth.
And from henceforth there shall be nothing corruptible;
For that Son of Man has appeared,
And has sat down on the throne of his glory,
And all evil shall pass away before his face,
And the word of that Son of Man shall go forth
And be strong before the Lord of Spirits. (1 Enoch 69:27-29)
The word of judgment issued by the Son of Man is said to “be strong before the Lord of Spirits,” which means that God approves and affirms the judgment passed by his agent. In other words, the Son of Man judges on the authority granted to him by God.
And thus the Lord commanded the kings and the mighty and the exalted, and those who dwell on the earth, and said:
“Open your eyes and lift up your horns if ye are able to recognize the Elect One.”
And the Lord of Spirits seated him on the throne of His glory,
And the spirit of righteousness was poured out upon him,
And the word of his mouth slays all the sinners,
And all the unrighteous are destroyed from before his face.
And there shall stand up in that day all the kings and the mighty,
And the exalted and those who hold the earth,
And they shall see and recognize how he sits on the throne of His glory,
And righteousness is judged before him,
And no lying word is spoken before him. (1 Enoch 62:1-3)
Note above that it is God (the “Lord of Spirits”) who seats the Son of Man upon God’s throne of glory. The Son of Man does not establish himself upon God’s throne: it is an agentive authority granted to him by God. This is the ancient view of royalty. It is stated more clearly a few chapters earlier, “And the Elect One shall in those days sit on My throne, and his mouth shall pour forth all the secrets of wisdom and counsel: for the Lord of Spirits has given them to him and has glorified him” (1 Enoch 51:3).
And all who dwell above in the heaven received a command and power and one voice and one light like unto fire.
And that One [the Elect One] with their first words they blessed,
And extolled and lauded with wisdom,
And they were wise in utterance and in the spirit of life.
And the Lord of Spirits placed the Elect One on the throne of glory.
And he shall judge all the works of the holy above in the heaven,
And in the balance shall their deeds be weighed
And when he shall lift up his countenance
To judge their secret ways according to the word of the name of the Lord of Spirits,
And their path according to the way of the righteous judgment of the Lord of Spirits,
Then shall they all with one voice speak and bless,
And glorify and extol and sanctify the name of the Lord of Spirits. (1 Enoch 61:6-9)
You mighty kings who dwell on the earth, you shall have to behold Mine Elect One, how he sits on the throne of glory and judges Azazel, and all his associates, and all his hosts in the name of the Lord of Spirits. (1 Enoch 55:4)
Notice above, again, that it is God who grants the Son of Man figure the right to sit on his throne. Notice also that the Son of Man not only judges the nations of men, but also “all the works of the holy above in the heaven.” In other words, this exalted human agent is given the authority to judge angels, but only “in the name of the Lord of Spirits.” Bear in mind that in the ancient world, “heaven” wasn’t the name of the place where the good angels lived, and “hell” the abode of the fallen angels. “Hell” was a place of punishment after the eschatological age, but “heaven” was the abode of all the angelic beings, both good and evil. It was believed that the wars between nations on earth were mirrored by wars between the gods in heaven.
On that day Mine Elect One shall sit on the throne of glory
And shall try their works,
And their places of rest shall be innumerable.
And their souls shall grow strong within them
When they see Mine elect ones,
And those who have called upon My glorious name:
Then will I cause Mine Elect One to dwell among them.
And I will transform the heaven and make it an eternal blessing and light
And I will transform the earth and make it a blessing:
And I will cause Mine elect ones to dwell upon it:
But the sinners and evil-doers shall not set foot thereon. (1 Enoch 45:3-5)
After the judgment, the exalted Son of Man is sent to dwell among the humans forever. In other words, in the words of Paul:
Then comes the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, after he has destroyed every ruler and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For ‘God has put all things in subjection under his feet.’ But when it says, ‘All things are put in subjection,’ it is plain that this does not include the One who put all things in subjection under him. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to the one who put all things in subjection under him, so that God may be all in all. (1 Cor 15:24-28)
In both the Similitudes and in Paul’s thought, the messiah functions as a temporary agent of God’s judgment who is granted access to God’s throne for the purpose of bringing all enemies into subjection to the will of God. It is apparently important in this sort of apocalyptic thought that God use a human agent, in order to restore humanity to God’s original intention. In both the Similitudes and in Paul, once this is accomplished and God’s agent has fulfilled his task, the authority is given back to God. Paul makes this explicit. In the Similitudes this is displayed by the fact that the Elect One leaves God’s throne in order to return to the new earth to dwell among his people forever. He is still God’s king and viceroy on earth, but his temporary access to God’s throne of glory and judgment is no longer necessary. In both texts, a clear distinction is made between God and his agent. That God is called “the Father” and the Messiah is called “the Son” in 1 Cor 15 does not imply any proto-trinitarian figuration. It is simply the standard Hebrew (and more broadly ancient) language used to describe the relationship between God and the king, who functioned as a mediator between heaven and earth (see again 2 Sam 7:14).
To disabuse ourselves of any lingering fancies that the “preeminence” ascribed to the son of man (son of Adam) implies divinity, a passage from Philo is in order:
And with great beauty Moses has attributed the giving of names to the different animals to the first created man, for it is a work of wisdom and indicative of royal authority, and man was full of intuitive wisdom and self-taught, having been created by the grace of God, and, moreover, was a king. And it is proper for a ruler to give names to each of his subjects. And, as was very natural, the power of domination was excessive in that first-created man, whom God formed with great care and thought worthy of the second rank in the creation, making him his own viceroy and the ruler of all other creatures. Since even those who have been born so many generations afterwards, when the race is becoming weakened by reason of the long intervals of time that have elapsed since the beginning of the world, do still exert the same power over the irrational beasts, preserving as it were a spark of the dominion and power which has been handed down to them by succession from their first ancestor. (On the Creation 148)1
This helps to clarify an important point about the notion of the Messiah’s dominion over all creation: the Messiah is not figured as divine when he described this way, but as a new Adam figure. This corresponds to Paul’s thought exactly, as evinced in multiple places throughout his corpus. The Messiah fulfills the role God always intended for humankind. In the created order, humanity is second only to God, and as the representative human, the Messiah restores the dignity of humankind and delivers humankind from subjection to hostile forces who long ago usurped humanity’s rightful place in the hierarchy. This is why, in Pauline thought, it is not just Jesus who is exalted and seated in heaven, but all those who are in him (Eph 2:6), and it is not just Jesus who is given authority to judge angels, but restored humanity itself (1 Cor 6:3). Similarly, the book of Revelation asserts that the dominion of the Messiah will not be his alone, but will be shared with his fellow human beings—those who follow him in the way of true humanity:
To everyone who conquers and continues to do my works to the end,
I will give authority over the nations;
to rule them with an iron rod,
as when clay pots are shattered—
even as I also received authority from my Father. (Rev 2:26-28a)
The authority is conferred upon redeemed humanity in the same way that it was conferred upon their representative Jesus: from God. That such authority belongs to Jesus can hardly be said to be evidence of his divinity, unless we take it to be evidence of our own divinity as well. Similarly, with the question of who has the authority to forgive sins, a question we will deal with in a later post. If forgiving sins is something that only God can do, then Jesus must have been making a statement about his disciples’ rightful place in the Godhead when he gave them the authority to forgive sins, or even to withhold forgiveness of sins (John 20:23). But we are getting ahead of ourselves.
February 5, 2010 - 5:27 PM
I just added a footnote with a quote about Adam’s enthronement from The Testament of Abraham. It’s hard to miss.
February 5, 2010 - 5:52 PM
yeah thanks for pointing at the foot note…i would have totally missed that minuscule portion of your post…on a serious note thanks for sharing all of this information.
February 5, 2010 - 6:01 PM
ha!
On a dire note, there is a helluva lot more information still to come. :/
February 19, 2010 - 1:42 PM
Thom,
Your comparison with the drama of 1 Cor 15 with 1 Enoch is interesting, but the Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37-71) do not necessarily imply the same theology. Furthermore, Jesus is never described as leaving the throne. Jesus submitting to the father is for “God to be all in all,” which does not necessarily imply anything ontological about Jesus’s lack of divinity. In fact, I think it makes a statement that accords well with Phil 2 about the kind of God Jesus is.
In 1 Cor 8.4-6 Paul is responding to controversies of food and idolatry. He clearly maintains a monotheistic framework, but must fit Jesus into the scheme:
“5 Indeed, even though there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as in fact there are many gods and many lords— 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.”
The father is whom all things are “from” ἐξ and the son is the one “through” διά whom all things exist. The parallelism is difficult to break into a temporary rulership for the sake of judgment. Paul has in mind a larger role than the Enochic son of man who succeeds the throne. Jesus’ submission to the father is not an indication that he lacks divinity, but rather makes a statement about the kind of divine one that he is.
February 19, 2010 - 1:52 PM
Tyler,
No. You are incorrect. This is a nice attempt to reconcile Paul’s language with later constructs, but it still doesn’t accord with what Paul actually says:
It says that Jesus gives the kingdom over to God, and says that Jesus must reign UNTIL all enemies are brought into subjection to him. This makes it absolutely clear that Paul envisages a temporary reign. Jesus reigns IN GOD’S STEAD as his agent, until everything is accomplished, then Jesus hands the reins back to the One who gave them to him.
There is NOTHING in this text identifying Jesus as God, and in fact, just prior to these verses, Paul sets us up with the Second Adam typology. It is precisely as the representative human that Christ’s reign is characterized.
And Phil 2 says nothing about Jesus being God, as you should know. That is also Adam typology. I will do a post dedicated to Phil 2 soon, but morphe theou is synonymous with eikon theou, as in Col 1:15, and connotes the language used to describe Adam. The parallels between Adam and Jesus in Phil 2 are numerous, and the carmen Christi even follows the events of Adam’s story chronologically. I’ll get there in a few more posts, so be patient.
Your claim that “Paul has in mind a larger role than the Enochic son of man” is without warrant, and is in fact false.
But I love you.
February 19, 2010 - 1:58 PM
Oh, I see the mistake you’re making here. “Through whom” is the language of agency in creation. It is not a statement about Jesus’ eschatological reign, but is part of Paul’s wisdom christology. Keep reading my posts. You’ll get to that eventually.
February 19, 2010 - 2:21 PM
Also, back to 1 Cor 15, pay attention to the logic here:
What does this say? It says that Christ is not currently in subjection to God. The subjection of the Son to God is something that will occur once all Christ’s enemies have been destroyed. This means that currently, as God’s agent, the Son enjoys a temporary state of functional equality with God. The Son is not yet properly in subjection to God because the Son is currently acting in God’s stead. Once everything has been accomplished through the agency of the Son, then the Son will also be brought into subjection to God.
This is not a statement about “the kind of divine one that he is,” by which you meant that he is God-ever-in-subjection-to-God. This is not what Paul says. It actually says that Christ is currently “Acting God,” but this won’t always be the case.